
I just wrapped up an audiobook of Malcolm Gladwell's "
The Tipping Point". I really enjoyed my last read by the author ("
Blink"). However, this one ended too fast - and the credits revealed that it was an abridged copy. I can't ever understand why people abridge books. Wikipedia
takes a stab at it, claiming that a book might take 40 hours to listen to, where it can be abridged into a handy 2 hours. This makes no sense to me. I could spend less time on
any task if I do a half-ass job of it. Why bother reading a book if not enjoy the whole thing?
The wikipedia article shows an example of what text is abridged:
A passage such as "John sped away in his automobile, a red 1967 Mustang he'd purchased from a junkyard and spent most of his college years restoring with his father" could be abridged to "John sped away in his car."
To me, this is a travesty. Those details are important. They help us learn who the characters are, what their history is, and that's what engages the reader to care about what happens to them. Everything interesting about a story can be abridged out, while they refine it down to just the actions people take and the words they spoke. It's the difference between reading Brideshead Revisited vs. a high school history book.
Now I'll have to get the hard-copy of The Tipping Point and re-read it, else feel I only skimmed a few pages.
Labels: audiobooks, books, rant, reading-now